Risk assessment of AI systems
We map where and how AI is used and assess the risks – including data leakage, model misuse and vendor dependency.
An AI management system per ISO/IEC 42001: risk assessment of AI systems, defining roles and accountability, managing data quality, and impact assessment. Suitable for both AI users and AI developers.
We map where and how AI is used and assess the risks – including data leakage, model misuse and vendor dependency.
Who decides on adoption, who is accountable for the output, who steps in when something goes wrong. Without this there is no management system.
Which data the model runs on, where it comes from, and whether it may be used for that purpose.
Impact on people and the organisation, including ethical and societal risks – the backbone of ISO 42001.
Practical rules for staff: what may be entered into AI tools, what may not, and how to check the output.
Documentation, internal audit and management review for the certification audit.
Before a policy, you need to know what is actually in use – including tools nobody formally approved.
For each AI system we assess risks and impacts – not only technical, but ethical and legal as well.
Roles, decision points, controls and documentation in the ISO/IEC 42001 structure.
Rules only reach people if they are explained. We train the team.
We verify that it works and prepare for the certification audit.
ISO/IEC 42001 is the management system standard for artificial intelligence. Structurally it resembles ISO 27001, but focuses on AI-specific topics: accountability, data provenance, model impact and transparency.
Yes. Most risk arises in use – what data goes into the tool, who checks the output, and who is accountable when a decision turns out to be wrong. For a user the management system is simpler, but still necessary.
They are separate: the regulation is law, the standard is a voluntary management framework. In practice, a system built to ISO 42001 covers a significant part of what the regulation expects in terms of risk management, documentation and oversight.
Yes, and that is usually the most sensible route. A shared management system structure, risk methodology, internal audit and management review – with the AI-specific part added on top.
Before policies and certificates, it is worth knowing what is already in use in your organisation and what risks come with it.
Preparing your company for the ISO 27001 audit.
Read more →Professional information-security leadership as a service – for companies that don't need a full-time security manager.
Read more →Independent assessment and an audit-readiness check.
Read more →We use Google Ads cookies to measure the effectiveness of our ads only with your consent. Language and theme preferences are always stored because the site needs them to work. Privacy policy